Image via Wikipedia
Humor me for a moment please.
Tell me what the following symbols mean in mathematical terms
(don’t worry I’m going somewhere with this)=
1.) <
2.) >
3.) =
1.) As in 2< 5 2.) As in 5>2 3.) As in 5=5
If you said, and in order less than, greater than, and equal you get a cookie. If you answered anything wrong or by hovering, your an idiot (you can still stay and read but only with the dunce cap and in the corner).
Now can someone tell me when, = came to mean women > men? Or Men < women? I thought all of this was about oh I don’t know EQUALITY. You know the Sufferage Movement was for great change and to wrench women out of the kitchen, and into the workforce, and into carreers? Yeah, all that. When the bloody heck did it come to mean treat men like crap for no reason other than the fact they have a penis and not a vagina? So seriously now, when did it become okay for women to pull crap out like this man is suffering through? not right, okay then How about men dealing with this kind of crap? So, you know it’s perfectly okay for women to make all the reproductive decisions but daddy dearest just has to provide his swimmers and cash?
Umm? Answers anyone? Raise you hands now!
No, it’s not right. It’s not okay.It is, however- bullshit.
Is it right? No, not by a long shot. If women were stripped of this important decision there would be hell to pay. (Hell I say!) No one is telling anyone (let alone me, considering it would make me blogging especially difficult) to “get back to the kitchen and make a sammitch”. What is being said? You butchered the actual feminist ideals. Dumbasses.
How’s this, actual feminism – Get off your ass, make something out of yourself.
Nowadays – Mindless screwing and abortions for all
(screw you Roe, and yes this is that one. I seriously hate this woman.)
Old school feminism:
Love your kids (yeah, they were pro life), here’s a quote:
In her publication, “The Revolution,” Anthony referred to abortion as “child-murder” and proclaimed, “No matter what the motive, … the woman is awfully guilty who commits the deed.”
Furthermore, she condemned as “thrice guilty” the man who, by commission or through omission, “drove her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime.”
For too many modern feminists, “a woman’s right to choose” to kill her preborn child for any reason at any time during pregnancy is not only an inviolable right, but is the highest feminist sacrament, thus the ultimate fulfillment of true womanhood.
Bolding is mine. I seriously have to call bull. It is bullshit, in every conceivable way. To hell with the whole party political system. To hell with all the god stuff. It’s a life.
Why don’t men get a say if the dumbass he bedded down with kills his kid or not? If he’s stepping up to the plate, and a decent human being why kill the kid? Selfishness. Don’t feed me any of that right to choose crap. If I meet you in the street do I get a choice in smacking you for bragging about your world record number of abortions? No. I don’t I get a one way ticket to the jail.
Oh I forgot, the dad gets to pay for part of the murder no matter what he thinks!
Lucky him. Lucky, lucky him.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=0156229d-d710-47c2-b3a9-8a7d8e960182)
5 responses so far ↓
Joshua // September 25, 2008 at 1:51 am |
Currently, the right to abortion comes from the right to control one’s own body. Therefore, the parent whose body the child is using is the one who gets to decide whether to have an abortion or not. If a man is pregnant, then the man gets to decide whether to have an abortion.
If, some day, infanticide is as accepted as abortion, in that case both parents would likely be needed to approve such a decision.
Reason Denied | Reason Defied // September 27, 2008 at 3:56 pm |
[...] Reading what I wrote a day or so ago about Feminism’s Bastardization. I realized I was in full on rant like a loon mode and didn’t really get my main point across (I confess, I get this way at times). Granted, I still stand by what I wrote (no backtracking from me) but it seems my main issues with Feminism now a days (doesn’t that saying just conjure up images of drinking lemonade whilst sitting in a rocking chair?) is it’s separation from it’s original ideals. [...]
Paul // November 10, 2008 at 8:27 pm |
If its OK for a woman to opt out of a pregnancy without considering the fathers feelings, it has to be OK for the man to have some way to opt out. If, when a woman decides that she will have a baby when the father does not want to be a part of it, she should be the one to pay for the child.
Brass // April 20, 2009 at 1:27 am |
Exactly, until the “Paper Abortion” exists, that allows men to pay a fee, file some papers and forever and anon not be a father to a particular child, there is no equality.
I personally believe that were such a thing to come into legal existance, you would see the numbers of abortions performed plummet like Britney Spears sanity.
Marshall Banana // May 6, 2009 at 8:13 am |
Well, here’s the thing. As a feminist, I don’t think it’s okay for it to be women make all the ideas about baby decisions. But frankly, women have been trained this is where their power lies. Women take part in sexist bullshit also, because if they didn’t there wouldn’t be any. As a feminist I disagree with it being alright, but I also disagree with the image of feminism you’re putting up. You seem misguided.